An Office of Tax Simplification (‘OTS’) review on moving the tax year from 5 April to 31 March makes complete sense, and the government and HM Revenue & Customs (‘HMRC’) should press ahead with the implementation as soon as possible, say leading tax and advisory firm Blick Rothenberg
Nimesh Shah, CEO at the firm said: “Although the change only involves 5 days, there will be need to careful consideration given to HMRC’s systems, which are presently hardwired to 5 April. There will be an administrative cost for the government, and HMRC needs to be confident that it can deliver a technological change in the timeframe agreed, which is proposed as being April 2023 to coincide with the Making Tax Digital timeline.
He added: If this change goes ahead, HMRC must act quickly to move ahead with the system updates, but HMRC will also need to do better with their communication to affected firms – banks, investment managers, estate agents, to name a few, will need to update their own systems, at their own time and cost, so that they can provide individual taxpayers with the correct information for the new tax year end. It may only be five days but could require a complete re-coding of legacy systems and processes.”
Nimesh added: “HMRC are facing a lot of change over the next 18 months, with the introduction of Making Tax Digital from April 2023; last week’s announcements about the new Health & Social Care Levy will alsorequire another significant system change, as the government have insisted this tax should be shown as a separate line item on people’s payslips. There is already a concern that HMRC will not have the resource or the time to implement these changes effectively, without adding a further change to the equation.
A short and surprise consultation by the OTS in June proposed moving the UK’s unique 5 April tax year, which has been the UK tax year end since 1800. The OTS did consider whether the tax year should be moved to 31 December, to align most developed countries, who run their tax year to the calendar year, including the US, China, Germany, France, Italy, and Spain. However, that move seems to be a step too far and the OTS appear to favour only the five day alteration.
Nimesh said: “It makes complete sense to change the tax year end to 31 March. Many businesses, companies and sole traders prepare their accounts to 31 March, and HMRC accept that a 31 March accounting year end can be used for filing a personal tax return. However, the majority of personal tax reporting needs to run to 5 April, which can cause administrative complications and transactions between 1 April – 5 April can sometimes be missed. The OTS believe that changing the tax year end could have the effect of reducing administrative errors when completing tax returns and help to reduce the ‘tax gap’ – the difference between the tax that the Treasury should have collected and what is actually received.”
Nimesh said: “Separate to this proposal from OTS, HMRC have a separate consultation on ‘basis period reform’ which closed at the end of August. This HMRC consultation is allegedly centred around simplifying the tax rules to make all unincorporated businesses follow the tax year for their accounting year. If this change was introduced, it would take effect from April 2023, again to coincide with Making Tax Digital. I may be reading too much into this, but it seems that the OTS and HMRC have lined themselves to make all these changes fit with Making Tax Digital from April 2023.”