Refresh

This website londonlovesbusiness.com/bank-of-england-is-damaging-uk-financial-services-and-economy-says-former-deputy-pm/ is currently offline. Cloudflare's Always Online™ shows a snapshot of this web page from the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine. To check for the live version, click Refresh.

Home Business News Bank of England is damaging UK financial services and economy, says former Deputy PM

Bank of England is damaging UK financial services and economy, says former Deputy PM

by LLB Finance Reporter
15th Mar 24 11:32 am

For the UK economy to grow substantially this year, the Bank of England mustĀ end its over-regulationĀ of financial services, says leading global financial services consultant Yerbol Orynbayev.

The intervention from the former Deputy Prime Minister of Kazakhstan follows reports ofĀ Revolutā€™s wait for its UK banking licence, which ā€“Ā due to demands from the Bank of Englandā€™s Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA)Ā ā€“ has now exceeded nearly three years despite internal confidence that it would be granted quicklyĀ (This is Money).

course, this is amidst the UKā€™s recent lacklustre economic performance: in Q4 2023, the country stooped into a technical recession, with GDP contracting 0.3% (Financial Times).

Orynbayev, who has also worked as a Governor of the World Bank on behalf of Kazakhstan, believes the Bank of England has taken an over-cautious approach to modern financial services firms and has hampered innovation in the process.

Yerbol Orynbayev said:Ā ā€œUnder the never-ending demands of the PRA, Revolutā€™s struggles to obtain its banking licence certainly shows one thing: along with the FCA, theĀ Bank of England is incredibly over-cautious.Ā Revolut has spearheaded innovation across FX services ā€“ and a banking licence would provide them with access to other services they could dramatically improve. The Bank of England is missing a trick. Theyā€™re hampering innovation.ā€

In the case of Revolut, a UK banking licence would allow them to operate more efficiently and effectively in the country ā€“ and offer a broader range of secure financial services to their customers. But, while banking licences are usually granted within 12 months of application (Financial Times), the delay has prevented them from innovating these different areas, hampering their development and effective offerings in the UK.

However, more recently, non-bank financial institutions (NBFIs) ā€“ which include insurance firms, asset managers, pension schemes, and venture capitalists ā€“ have also been targeted. According to theĀ Financial Stability Board, NBFIs hold just over 46% of global financial assets or approximately $218 trillion USD. Moreover, they have contributed to almost all of the Ā£425 billion net increase in UK business lending since 2008 (Reuters).

Fearing their influence could leave the UK vulnerable to a credit crunch,Ā the Bank of Englandā€™s Deputy Governor Sarah Breeden has recently outlined the central bankā€™s intentions to build a proactive case for regulating non-banks (Reuters).Ā Of course, Orynbayev understands the need for this increased oversight but is wary about punishing these financial institutions for an issue that arose from then-PM Liz Trussā€™ tax cuts in 2022.

Orynbayev continued:Ā ā€œLiz Trussā€™ tax cuts in 2022 sparked this whole regulatory movement: UK government bonds were manically bought, yields rose, revealing vulnerabilities across the UKā€™s vast network of NBFIs. To boil it down to its very core, the Bank of Englandā€™s calls for regulation against NBFIs have stemmed from a critical political error.

ā€œBut this is not a surprise. Since the 2008 financial crisis, regulation against financial institutions has tightened and the spotlight on financial services has only shone brighter and harsher. The Bank of England needs to be wary of this approach, as reactive regulatory punishments like this could hamper the growth of the UKā€™s wider financial services landscape.ā€

Besides financial services, the Bank of England has also been overly cautious with its rates policy. Huw Pill, the chief economist at the central bank, recently warned that a cut to UK interest rates is still ā€œsome way offā€ (The Standard), dulling hopes for increased business activity and economic growth. Orynbayev believes the Bank of Englandā€™s hesitancy is impacting not only financial services, but also the countryā€™s economic potential.

Orynbayev concluded:Ā ā€œHuw Pillā€™s recent comments on cutting interest rates is indicative of the Bank of Englandā€™s wider issue. Its hesitancy. Following months of economic troubles, the Bank of England should be itching to reignite the UKā€™s business activity and, as a result, supercharge the economy. But theyā€™re doing quite the opposite. Theyā€™re twiddling their thumbs.

ā€œThe UKā€™s financial services sector has been the brunt of the central bankā€™s caution. And, for a country that has produced groundbreaking challenger banks like Monzo and Starling, this friendly fire is only going to put a ceiling on innovation ā€“ and leave its financial services sector in cobwebs.

ā€œThe Bank of England now has an opportunity to dictate the future of the UKā€™s thriving financial services ecosystem and the economyā€™s post-recession recovery. But, to ensure both, they need to shift their attitude. They canā€™t shy away from risk.ā€

Leave a Comment

You may also like

CLOSE AD

Sign up to our daily news alerts

[ms-form id=1]