Home Insights & AdviceOpen banking vs. digital wallets: Why Skrill still holds a key role for UK forex brokers

Open banking vs. digital wallets: Why Skrill still holds a key role for UK forex brokers

by Sarah Dunsby
26th Aug 25 3:42 pm

Scroll through any UK-regulated Forex brokerโ€™s website and you will spot two payment options anchoring the deposit screen: โ€œInstant Bank Transfer (Open Banking)โ€ and โ€œSkrill Wallet.โ€ They may look like interchangeable buttons, yet each represents a different philosophy of moving money. Open banking pulls sterling straight from a userโ€™s bank account via the Faster Payments rail; Skrill stores multiple currencies inside a private wallet that can be topped up with cards, other wallets, or even crypto.

Why does this matter? Because a single missed deposit can mean a missed trade, a lost client, and thousands in lifetime revenue walking out the virtual door. UK business professionals, fintech enthusiasts, and active traders therefore have a shared interest in understanding which rail does what and why top-tier brokers with Skrill refuse to drop this option, even as open banking grabs headlines.

The article that follows cuts through the buzzwords and focuses on what drives brokerage performance: funding speed, cost control, compliance, and user loyalty. We will zero in on the two payment methods that determine those outcomes, explain their respective strengths and blind spots, and finish with a practical playbook for marrying the best of both.

Why payments decide brokerage success

When a prospect lands on the cashier page, the list of available rails is more than a formality; it is the first credibility check. If the traderโ€™s preferred method is missing or expensive, they usually leave forever.

The Conversion Triangle

Every deposit route must satisfy three competing forces:

  • Speed. Funds need to arrive in seconds, not hours.
  • Cost. Payment fees must not wipe out the brokerโ€™s tight FX spreads.
  • Compliance. The rail must meet FCA mandates on Strong Customer Authentication (SCA), anti-money-laundering, and safeguarding.

Open banking and Skrill both address these pillars, but in different proportions. Understanding that difference is how brokers shave basis points off costs while boosting lifetime value per trader.

Open banking: Promise and practicalities

Open banking in the UK is effectively PSD2 in action: regulated third-party providers call a bankโ€™s API, the client approves via their normal online-banking log-in, and a Faster Payments transfer fires off. The money is irrevocable, so the broker never faces a card chargeback.

Strengths that matter

First and most obvious is settlement speed. A successfully authorised payment typically lands inside the brokerโ€™s client-money account in under ten seconds. The second strength is price. Provider quotes between 0.1% and 0.3% are common for UK-domestic flows; that is, a fraction of the blended 1.6%โ€“2.2% cost of card acquiring. Finally, built-in SCA means the broker passes an FCA audit without having to juggle 3-D Secure pop-ups.

Pain points in the real world

Once a broker looks beyond UK bettors trading GBP currency pairs, weaknesses surface. Coverage outside PSD2 jurisdictions is patchy, and non-GBP deposits often incur unadvertised bank FX spreads. Recurring payments, meanwhile, are still stuck at the pilot stage because Variable Recurring Payments (VRP) only supports โ€œsweepingโ€ between accounts owned by the same person. That forces the trader to initiate each top-up manually, a friction that cuts deposit frequency.

User-experience snags also linger. Challenger-bank customers, common among younger traders, sometimes face outbound transfer limits that trigger call-centre interactions. Fear of delays drives these clients to maintain a wallet account anyway, precisely where Skrill keeps its foothold.

Skrill: The wallet that refuses to become obsolete

Created in 2001, Skrill evolved from a gaming wallet into a multi-currency powerhouse owned by Paysafe. It thrives because it plugs the gaps left by banking rails.

Multicurrency, loyalty and VIP stickiness

A single Skrill account can hold balances in more than forty currencies and lets users flip between them at transparent spreads. That matters to a UK broker courting clients in Nigeria, Chile, or Vietnam, no local bank integration needed. Layered on top is a VIP ladder that rewards volume. A trader moving ยฃ30k a month earns Silver status; at ยฃ150 k the client can hit Gold or Diamond and see FX margins drop sharply. Those perks increase retention for the broker without adding any development work.

Rapid transfer: Skrill’s hybrid weapon

Rapid Transfer, Skrillโ€™s open-banking feature, bolts PSD2 rails onto the wallet. A UK trader authorises a bank payment, funds land in the wallet, and immediately travel to the broker. If the user lacks a Skrill account, the system quietly creates one, sliding them into loyalty programs without a separate signup. That means one integration gives the broker two rails open banking for domestic speed, a wallet for cross-border versatility.

Cost and risk economics

Yes, wallet fees start with higher headline rates of 1which %-2% are standard, but those can be renegotiated for volume, and Skrill eats the card-chargeback risk when traders upload funds by card. Brokers, therefore, swap variable fraud expense for a known fee, simplifying forecasting.

Strategy and compliance: Making the two rails work together

Top-performing brokers no longer argue over โ€œeither/or.โ€ They run both rails and let context decide the winner for each user, each transaction.

Dynamic cashier design

A well-built cashier detects a UK IP and a GBP trading account and defaults to open banking, labelling it โ€œFee-Free & Instant.โ€ If the system picks up non-UK residency or sees a wallet address on file, Skrill jumps to the top, showcasing multicurrency storage and loyalty perks.

Compliance synergy

Skrillโ€™s own Know-Your-Customer process screens documents against a global PEPs-and-sanctions list, outsourcing the first layer of defence. Open banking supplies unforgeable name-match data straight from the bank. Cross-reconciling the two data streams lets compliance teams catch anomalies that each rail might miss. That cooperative model helped one London broker reduce manual review time by 28% quarter-over-quarter, a saving both in labour and in faster client activation.

Chargeback shield

Wallets also serve as an insurance policy. By steering higher-risk regions or first-time depositors to Skrill, brokers can firewall themselves against a spike in fraud without blocking legitimate users.

Outlook and conclusion

Will newer technologies dethrone both rails? Variable Recurring Payments aim to turn open banking into a true โ€œset-and-forgetโ€ experience. The FCA committed in January 2025 to introducing VRP in 2025, with the FCA and PSR expecting “significant progress” throughout 2025 that will see live services available for consumers to make recurring payments to utility companies, government, and financial services firms.

Central-bank digital currencies are being explored by the Bank of England, yet consultation documents envision private intermediaries Skrill, Paysafe, or similar wallets, already handling consumer-facing balances. Crypto on-ramps theoretically solve borderless payments, but price volatility and regulatory uncertainty keep compliance teams wary.

Given those realities, a dual-rail strategy is more than hedging; it is long-term resilience. Open banking delivers the cheapest, fastest domestic transfers, perfect for UK residents funding in GBP. Skrill captures every other scenario: multi-currency traders, regions without PSD2 coverage, loyalty-driven clients, or users who simply want a fallback during bank outages.

For UK fintech professionals weighing partnership decisions, the message is straightforward: treat payments as a product, not plumbing. For traders, keep both options in your toolkit so that market moves never outrun your ability to fund an account. And for brokers, remember that the purple Skrill logo beside the โ€œInstant Bankโ€ button is not redundant; it is your margin, your risk buffer, and your client-loyalty engine rolled into one.

 

The above information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by London Loves Business and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any finance decisions. Appropriate independent advice should be obtained before making any such decision. London Loves Business bears no responsibility for any gains or losses.

Leave a Comment

CLOSE AD

Sign up to our daily news alerts

[ms-form id=1]