Unless youโve been hiding under a rock, anyone in business will know that from April, the government is hiking employer National Insurance Contributions (NICs) from 13.8% to 15%.
Itโs expected to rake in an extra ยฃ25 billion for the Treasury. But this isnโt just another tax rise, itโs a tax on jobs, and itโs going to backfire spectacularly.
Instead of generating more money, it will push businesses to cut jobs, stop hiring, or even shut down altogether, leading to fewer people in work, lower tax revenues, and more pressure on the benefits system. Itโs basic economics, yet the government seems blind to the reality of whatโs coming.
Employers across the UK are already warning that this increase will force them to make some tough decisions. Many are halting recruitment, cutting back staff hours, or reducing their workforce entirely.
Others are looking at scaling down operations or closing altogether. Businesses are already drowning in rising costs, from soaring energy bills and increased supplier prices to higher wages and red tape. This NICs increase is just another kick in the teeth for employers, and the unintended consequence will be fewer people in work and a bigger drain on the welfare system.
The reality is that businesses wonโt just roll over and accept this. Theyโll do what they need to survive, and that includes moving towards a cash-in-hand economy.
If the cost of employment keeps rising, more businesses will find ways to sidestep the system, paying workers off the books to avoid NICs. This is a disaster waiting to happen. Not only does it mean lost tax revenue for the Treasury, but it also leaves workers without job security, proper wages, or pension contributions.
Itโs a return to the black economy, a step back to the days when โcash onlyโ was the norm in many trades. This doesnโt just hurt the government, it hurts everyone.
The biggest problem with this tax grab is that itโs built on a flawed assumption. The government seems to believe that businesses will simply absorb the extra cost and carry on as normal.
But they wonโt. They canโt. Every job cut means lost tax revenue. Every business closure means less corporation tax, VAT, and business rates.
Every company that scales back means less spending, less investment, and fewer opportunities. Instead of filling the Treasuryโs pockets, this tax increase will empty them, wiping out the supposed gains and leaving the economy in a worse state than before.
A better approach would be to encourage business growth. If companies are thriving, they naturally generate more tax revenue, through employment, investment, and expansion. Strong businesses mean more jobs, not fewer.
But by making it more expensive to hire people, the government is effectively putting a cap on economic growth. Itโs a short-sighted, self-defeating policy that will do more harm than good.
Rachel Reeves may think sheโs filling a hole in the budget, but sheโs digging a bigger one. This isnโt just bad for business owners, itโs bad for workers, bad for tax revenue, and ultimately, bad for Britain.
Leave a Comment