Formula 1 chief Bernie Ecclestone made a “corrupt bargain” to control the sport, the high court heard yesterday.
German media firm Constantin Medien is seeking $100m (£90m) in damages, arguing that Ecclestone deliberately undervalued the Formula 1 Group during its sale in 2006.
Ecclestone’s lawyers say the claim lacks “merit”.
The BBC reports that Philip Marshall QC, representing Constantin, said a banker had “assisted” Ecclestone in selling the Formula 1 Group to a “purchaser chosen by Mr Ecclestone”.
He went on to say that Gerhard Gribkowsky, a German banking official, received “corrupt payments” worth £27m.
Marshall said: “The central issues are, firstly, over whether these payments were corrupt and, secondly, over whether they resulted in a sale of the investment of [the German bank] in a group of companies owning the lucrative commercial rights associated with Formula 1 motor racing at a significant undervalue.”
Gribkowsky has been jailed for eight-and-a-half years for corruption, and a German court is due to decide next year if Ecclestone should stand trial on bribery charges.
The high court trial will last for six weeks.
- Follow me @LondonlovesBiz and @shrutitripathi6
- Try our free newsletter
You need to read:
Exclusive interview: Bernie Ecclestone on bribery, women and Murdoch – part 1
The Ecclestone interview – part 2: How Bernie seized control of F1
The Ecclestone interview, part 3: Inside Bernie’s private world
Leave a Comment